Home Research Papers1. about two times as quickly as untreated mice.

1. about two times as quickly as untreated mice.

1.     What do you think about antioxidants
as anticancer agents?

It depends or I would
like to say No Idea, Anti-oxidants are neither be a anticancer nor be a
carcinogenic the studies mentioned in the given papers failed to explain antioxidants
as carcinogenic agent. But some studies shown that antioxidants potential
anticancer agents and said that no action towards growing tumor.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Rationale

In Volkan I sayin.et al.
tried to demonstrate that Antioxidants
Accelerate Lung Cancer Progression in Mice. But I think the in this study
the tumor is induced by promoting or overexpression tumor gene. Which is not
exist in the nature.

And Limitation in this
study, Mouse model will not demonstrate in human all the time.

And my previous knowledge
is that antioxidants are nothing but vitamins which are naturally available.

The book named as Cancer and Vitamin C, about vitamin C’s great potential as an anti-    cancer   agent by Linus Pauling. As name suggest
potential not well-established facts.

 

2.     What do you think Dr. Watson’s
message is?

Completely
base less statement.

Rationale

As
answered to first question its controversial debatable concept but due to lack
of scientific efforts and current studies still failed to demonstrate whether
antioxidants are anticancer agent or not.

3.     Who is wrong and who is right?

No one. Jim Watson’s has not provided significant scientific
explanation about the issue.

Volkan I sayin.et al.
tried to demonstrate that Antioxidants
Accelerate Lung Cancer Progression in Mice. But in there study model they
have used the tumor cells are induced not naturally existed tumor. Previous
knowledge is that no model or rare animal model exhibit tumor growth rate three
times and this kind accelerated tumor growth we can’t see in nature it is
nothing but over expression of tumor inducing factor.

According to Lindahl, The tumours grew about three times faster
than those in animals that did not receive the antioxidant. Treated mice also
died from their cancers about two times as quickly as untreated mice. Needs
further interpretation.

Therefore, given limited
article and there research work provides inadequate explanation to demonstrate
what they have stated.

 

 

4.     Evaluate opinions versus facts in
scientific reasoning

Volkan I sayin.et al.
tried to demonstrate that Antioxidants
Accelerate Lung Cancer Progression in Mice. But in there study model they
have used the tumor cells are induced not naturally existed tumor. Previous
knowledge is that no model or rare animal model exhibit tumor growth rate three
times and this kind accelerated tumor growth we can’t see in nature it is
nothing but over expression of tumor inducing factor.

The book named as Cancer and Vitamin C, about vitamin C’s great potential as an anti-    cancer   agent by Linus Pauling. As name suggest
potential not well-established facts.

 

In paper 11, The animal
model used which is aggressive. On another hand inactivation P53. The main
course question is that whether inactivation P53 is due to antioxidant ?
inactivation P53 is due another factor that overexpressed due to genes/mutation
used in animal model? have to know.

In paper 11, talking
about clinical trials about vitamin A and Vitamin E but further intervention required.
 Like on which population they have
conducted the prevalence of lung cancer in that population. Has to consider
genome factor of particular population.

 

5.    
Take notes and
write a page report addressing your understanding of the impact of

antioxidants in cancer prevention

Based on previous
knowledge. Antioxidants are nothing but vitamin C and vitamin E. have vital
role to maintain homeostasis.

Above mentioned vitamins play
vital role in neutralizing in free radicals. Free radicals or reactive oxygen species
are nothing but waste product left after metabolism in the body always carry a
valency of electron and due to this valency free radical interact with any
product causes disruption of that molecule also damage to parts of cells such as proteins, DNA, and cell
membranes by stealing their electrons through a process called oxidation.

Free radicals has potential causes cancer may lead to cancer. But not
all the time. Free radicals or reactive oxygen species one of the risk factor
that will causes the cancer. The condition is that caner is not only dependent
of free radicals, cancer will induce in human by other etiological factors risk
factors.

The antioxidants are nothing but electron acceptor binds with free
radical neutralizes it. Three by antioxidants potentially act as anti-cancer
agent.

But there is very study conducted to demonstrate antioxidants are
potentially causes cancer. And more study required to justify.

1.     Are antioxidants good for you?
JUSTIFY your answer

It depends. If my body is possessing with more free radicals than I need
antioxidant to rectify the problem. If my body is possessing with normal and
host system itself manage free radical in the body than no need of
antioxidants.

 

Note: The given limited article are not significantly justifying antioxidant
could be anticancer agents. Or not.

But still need do more study to establish the statement cancer could be
treated wit antioxidents

 

x

Hi!
I'm Alfred!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out